search
CONSENT of the GOVERNED PROJECT

to change the county charter  and restore sovereignty to every citizen.

Recent quotes from three of our own county council members on their positions as elected officials are revealing as to how they view their proper roles : 

“it sometimes takes a law to change people's behavior”

 "Sometimes I have to be forced to do things that are right and I don't want to.”

 (I need) “to take charge, to lead our County, to define policy in the best interests of the people of our island. “

Frightening, isn't it !


Our county government lately has taken on 3 roles:

  • Administrative (such as determining how many police to hire, or where a road should go, or how to process garbage). This is an appropriate level of authority and responsibility for them to play.
  • Telling us what things we CAN NOT do i.e.:restricting our rights, more so every year
  • Taking our money: i.e.: taxes and fees

We the people have delegated out elected officials the power to be administrators, but we have NOT delegated them the power to restrict our lives and take our money without our permission.

The Consent of the Governed acts will restore forever this authority and sovereignty to the people of the Big Island.

 

 

IN PRESS
This area does not yet contain any content.

Conservative, Non-partisan  E Komo Mai !

 

Saturday
Jan282012

Appetite for taxes

http://www.hawaiitribune-herald.com/sections/commentary/your-views/your-views-jan-25.html

Your Views for Jan. 25, 2012

In reference to the county's review of their land tax policies, County Finance Director Nancy Crawford was recently quoted telling the County Council, "Ultimately, you charge the rates you need to get the revenue you need to run the county." Then, Ms Crawford, are there any limits to government's insatiable appetite to spending and taxing, or is it only matter of taxing to meet any spending level?

In a recent Tribune-Herald article, County Real Property Assistant Administrator Michael McCall is quoted as saying that the agricultural property assessment exemption program, which accounts for approximately 14 percent of property taxes that could be collected annually, is "very lucrative," as if it were the government's money in the first place.

In that same article, consultant Jeff Melrose noted that agricultural land for "a retirement home for a couple of sheep and a llama" is somehow not a bona fide farm. If so, than what other zoning classification would be more (legitimate) for the freedom of a retired American?

What has happened to our republic? Since when did owning private property become a liability, subject to the taxing whim of progressive bureaucrats? When did we become a people of the government, by the government and for the government?

Rick Toledo Jr.

Hilo

(Mr. Toledo is a Director of the Conservative Forum for Hawaii)

Sunday
Jan222012

Heritage Foundation director to speak on Hope for Hawaii Education 

 

Heritage Foundation director to speak on Hope for Hawaii Education

 

Jennifer Marshall of the distinguished national think-tank Heritage Foundation will be speaking in Hilo on “Hope for Hawaii Education: How We Can Win School Choice”.   The talk is open to the public and will be at 6:00 pm Thursday February 2 at the New Star restaurant, 172 Kilauea Ave., Hilo.  Ms. Marshall is Director of Domestic Policy Studies for the Heritage Foundation, widely considered one of the world's most influential public policy research institutes. In 2010, National Journal named her as “one of 12 power players” in Washington, D.C. for her work on school choice and education reform.

She will be speaking about Hawaii education at several engagements around the state, on Oahu at BYU and at the Heritage Foundation special event at the Hilton Hawaiian Village, then in Hilo and Kona.

Big Island residents ranked Education their #1 concern at the recent Hawaii Island Economic Summit sponsored by the County of Hawaii and Kona transportation.  There are ongoing concerns about the quality of our Hawaii public schools, the increasing popularity of charter schools and the recent HSTA contract issues about teacher performance evaluation. Parents are increasingly seeking empowerment to influence their children’s education for the better. Ms. Marshall has great insight in such issues, especially in light of recent Washington, D.C. school system experiences such as their Opportunity Scholarship Program passed by Congress in 2004, phased out by President Obama in 2009 and resurrected in 2011.

The Conservative Forum for Hawaii and The Hilo Tea Party are jointly sponsoring Ms. Marshall’s Hilo presentation.

$15 charge will include buffet dinner.

For further information contact Marie Ruhland   895-3741   marie@hiipm.com



Thursday
Dec222011

PLASTIC BAG BAN: one last chance

22 December, 2011
Dear Forum:

There is still one last chance for you to help prevent the plastic bag ban from becoming law :

the Mayor's veto.


If Mayor Billy Kenoi vetoes the bill, (as Mayor Harry Kim did before, from his hospital bed, through his acting representative),

then the progressive gang of five (Blas, Ford, Hoffman, Pilago and Smart) will not have the 6 votes needed to over-ride him.
This bill would NEVER survive a referendum vote by all the people, but it is being crammed down our throats anyway.

If the Mayor signs this in to law, and you did NOT do anything to try and stop it, you will forever know it happened in part because YOU  allowed it to.

See below our letter and response from him.

Please contact the Mayor,
call, or write, or fax, or email, and ask him not to play the Grinch at Christmas giving us this nasty lump of coal as a present.
We deserve better.

Thanx !

aloha

Mayor-Billy-Kenoi.jpgMayor’s Office
East Hawai‘i:
25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2603, Hilo, HI 96720
(808) 961-8211 | Fax: (808) 961-6553 | TDD: (808) 961-8521
West Hawai‘i: 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway, Bldg C, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740
(808) 323-4444 | Fax: (808) 323-4440 | TDD: (808) 327-6003
Email: cohmayor@co.hawaii.hi.us

 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject:     RE: Testimony regarding plastic bag ban
Date:     Thu, 22 Dec 2011 12:22:52 -1000
From:     cohmayor@co.hawaii.hi.us
To:     forumhawaii@gmail.com

Aloha Walter and Dr. Ed,

Mahalo for your email and I appreciate your perspectives about the
proposed plastic bag ban. We will definitely consider your thoughts before
we make a decision on this bill.

Mele Kalikimaka

Billy


From: Conservative Forum Hawaii [mailto:forumhawaii@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 7:04 PM
To: cohmayor@co.hawaii.hi.us
Subject: Testimony regarding plastic bag ban



conforhawaii.com

Dear Mr. Mayor:

Banning plastic bags is a terrible idea. It will raise everyone’s cost of living, make our lives just a little bit more difficult, and will
accomplish none of the ban’s stated goals.

Your help is greatly needed.

Paper bags cost more than plastic ones, which is why shopping will be just a little more expensive.
Plastic bags have way more utility and convenience than paper bags and reusable shopping bags,
so everyone’s life will get  just a little more inconvenient.

Especially right now, with our economy in the tank and folks really struggling,
we expect our politicians to make our lives less expensive and easier, not cost more and be more difficult.

Our position as conservatives is that this bag ban law is another unwarranted micro-management of our lives that should not be the purview
of our elected officials.

We also feel all  the arguments by the progressive activists pushing this are all wrong, and the net effect would actually be harmful.

    * We feel that litter is a behavioral problem, not an object problem.
For example, we cannot reduce car accidents by banning just Toyotas.

    * Plastic bags will be replaced by paper, which is less environmentally kind than plastic, takes even more landfill room, and
actually introduces more carbon into the air than plastic bag production and use.

    * Plastic bags do NOT contribute any significant content to the vast mass of sea-borne plastic debris, which is nearly all small
particulates of other origin.

    * NO scientific studies show plastic bags are a significant harm to wildlife. None.  Only a very few, rare, isolated and over-hyped photos
contradict this, not any real science.

    * Plastic bags will be replaced by paper, or re-usable bags, which are much less useful for the full spectrum that bags are currently used
for (transparent, cheap, light, and water-proof)

    * Paper bags will be more expensive than plastic, costs that the poorest among us can afford the least

    * These sorts of details of daily life are for individuals to decide, NOT the nanny-state government.

Personal liberty is again lessened by this ban. Bad idea.

Warmest aloha

    Walter Moe, President   
    Edward Gutteling M.D., V.P.  

Tuesday
Dec202011

Plastic bag ban : last gasp !

 

 

 

 

 http://www.hawaiireporter.com/fighting-plastic-bag-ban-on-big-island/123

http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/5694/Pilago-Seen-as-Swing-Vote-on-Hawaii-County-Bag-Ban.aspx

Conservative Forum Banner.jpg
CONFORHAWAII.COM

19 December, 2011


Dear Forum:

We have one last chance to persuade our County Council NOT to go ahead with Pete Hoffman's plastic bag ban.
Your help is needed. If everyone adds a voice, the impact will be felt.  Recent public feed-back has been very much against this law, and momentum is building.
Most councilmen have re-election on their minds, and are sensitive to the people's voices.

The next and final council meeting on this is Wed, 21 December.
Please let them know how you feel, immediately, by sending them an email or fax. (Too late for US mail.)
Mr. Pilago is the key swing vote, and he can indeed be influenced for the better.

Please do NOT let this drop.
It is just like the "broken window" theory of police work: allowing small crimes to go unpunished,  like breaking windows, leads to massive larger crimes becoming common.
Allowing even the small loss of liberties to go unchecked inevitably leads the ratchet to go only one direction towards our loss of even greater liberties.
This has got to stop, and you can and must help.

Our position as conservatives is that this bag ban law is another unwarranted micro-management of our lives that should not be the purview of our elected officials.
We also feel all the arguments by the progressive activists pushing this are all wrong, and the net effect would actually be harmful.

Thursday
Nov242011

Happy thanksgiving: in gratitude for what god has given us




By the President of the United States of America.

October 3, 1863

A Proclamation.


The year that is drawing towards its close, has been filled with the blessings of fruitful fields and healthful skies. To these bounties, which are so constantly enjoyed that we are prone to forget the source from which they come, others have been added, which are of so extraordinary a nature, that they cannot fail to penetrate and soften even the heart which is habitually insensible to the ever watchful providence of Almighty God.

In the midst of a civil war of unequaled magnitude and severity, which has sometimes seemed to foreign States to invite and to provoke their aggression, peace has been preserved with all nations, order has been maintained, the laws have been respected and obeyed, and harmony has prevailed everywhere except in the theatre of military conflict; while that theatre has been greatly contracted by the advancing armies and navies of the Union.

Needful diversions of wealth and of strength from the fields of peaceful industry to the national defence, have not arrested the plough, the shuttle or the ship; the axe has enlarged the borders of our settlements, and the mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals, have yielded even more abundantly than heretofore.

Population has steadily increased, notwithstanding the waste that has been made in the camp, the siege and the battle-field; and the country, rejoicing in the consiousness of augmented strength and vigor, is permitted to expect continuance of years with large increase of freedom.

No human counsel hath devised nor hath any mortal hand worked out these great things.

They are the gracious gifts of the Most High God, who, while dealing with us in anger for our sins, hath nevertheless remembered mercy. It has seemed to me fit and proper that they should be solemnly, reverently and gratefully acknowledged as with one heart and one voice by the whole American People.

I do therefore invite my fellow citizens in every part of the United States, and also those who are at sea and those who are sojourning in foreign lands, to set apart and observe the last Thursday of November next, as a day of Thanksgiving and Praise to our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens.

And I recommend to them that while offering up the ascriptions justly due to Him for such singular deliverances and blessings, they do also, with humble penitence for our national perverseness and disobedience, commend to His tender care all those who have become widows, orphans, mourners or sufferers in the lamentable civil strife in which we are unavoidably engaged, and fervently implore the interposition of the Almighty Hand to heal the wounds of the nation and to restore it as soon as may be consistent with the Divine purposes to the full enjoyment of peace, harmony, tranquillity and Union.

In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the City of Washington, this Third day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and of the Independence of the Unites States the Eighty-eighth.

By the President:  Abraham Lincoln

William H. Seward,
Secretary of State


The real history of the Mayflower Pilgrims was recounted by their leader, William Bradford (1590-1657) in his book Of Plymouth Plantation, completed in 1647.  It is from Bradford that we learn of Squanto, who did indeed show the Pilgrims how to "set" or plant corn (a new unfamiliar crop for them).  Then we learn that the Pilgrims taught the Indians how to grow more corn than they ever had before:

"The Indeans used to have nothing so much corne as they have since the English have stored them with their hoes, and seene their industrie in breaking up new grounds therwith."

The Pilgrims landed in December 1620, suffered a horrible winter, figured out how to fish and hunt that spring and summer so that there may have been some sort of feast with friendly Indians in the fall of 1621 - although Bradford doesn't recount the incident.
They were a commune, and shared all the labor and all the results, as determined by the Governor.
But by 1622 they were starving.

There was no "Thanksgiving" that year.
There was the next - for 1623 saw the Pilgrims in well-fed abundance, and thus was the year of the real First Thanksgiving.
What made the difference? Here are Bradford's own words describing Anno Dom.1623:


It may be thought strange that these people should fall to these extremities in so short a time, being left competently provided when the ship [the Mayflower] left them, and had an addition by that moyetie [portion] of corn that was got by trade, besides much they got of the Indians where they lived, by one means and other.

It must needs be their great disorder, for they spent excessively whilst they had, or could get it. And after they began to come into wants, many sold away their clothes and bed coverings; others (so base were they) became servants to the Indians, and would cut them wood and fetch them water for a cap full of corn; others fell to plain stealing, both night and day, from the Indians, of which they grievously complained. In the end, they came to that misery that some starved and died with cold and hunger...

All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery.

At length, after much debate of things, the Governor [Bradford] (with the advise of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular [plant corn on his own private land], and in that regard trust to them selves; in all other things to go on in the general way as before.

And so [there was] assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number for that end, only for present use (but made no division for inheritance), and ranged all boys and youth under some family.
This had very good success; for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted then other wise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content.

The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little-ones with them to set corn, which before they would allege weakness and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and oppression.

The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years, and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by some of later times -- that the taking away of property, and bringing in communities into a common wealth, would make them happy and flourishing, as if they were wiser than God.

For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young-men that were most able and fit for labor and service did repine [complain] that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children, with out any recompense.

The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division [in amount] of victails [food] and clothes, than he that was weak and not able to do a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors, and victails, clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them.

And for men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it.

Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they thought them selves in the like condition, and have as good as another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take of the mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them.

And would have been worse if they had been men of another condition. Let none object this is men's corruption, and nothing to the course itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them...

 By the time harvest was come [fall 1623], instead of famine, now God gave them plenty, and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God.
And the effect of their particular planting was well seen, for all had, one way and other, pretty well to bring the year about, and some of the abler sort and more industrious had to spare, and sell to others, so as any general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day [1647].